Feature
Reviewing
Answering a reviewer invitation, opening the anonymous files, filling in the review form and sending your report.
When you are invited to review a submission, the invitation arrives by e-mail and as a notification in the panel. You follow your invitations and reviews on the Author & reviewer → Reviewing screen. This section appears if you have the reviewer role or have received at least one invitation.
You do not need the Reviewer role to review. Every invited user can accept the invitation and review. The reviewer role and the reviewer pool option in the profile let the editors' reviewer search suggest you.
When you accept the invitation with a conflict of interest declaration, you get access to the submission's anonymous files only. You write your report with the review form and send it. A sent report cannot be changed. Your later remarks go to the editors as a separate note. For your first invitation, start with Responding to a Review Invitation.
Topics in this section
How-to guides
-
Responding to a Review Invitation
Opening a review invitation, accepting it with a conflict-of-interest declaration, or declining it with an optional reason.
-
Opening the Anonymous Files
Opening and downloading the files of a review you accepted, stripped of author details, and knowing when your access ends.
-
Writing a Review
Scoring the criteria in the review form, choosing your recommendation, writing comments to the author and the editor, adding an attachment and submitting the review.
-
Sending a Note to the Editors
Sending the editors a separate note to add a correction or an explanation to a review you have already submitted.
-
Joining the Reviewer Pool
Joining the reviewer pool from your profile and setting the expertise keywords that editors use to find you.
Screens and settings
-
Reviewing Screen
The tabs and rows of the screen where reviewers follow their invitations, their reviews in progress and the reviews they completed.
-
Review Invitation Screen
The header and cards of the screen where an invitation and its review open, and its views for pending, accepted and closed invitations.
Concepts
-
Peer Review Types
What authors and reviewers see of each other in double-anonymous, single-anonymous and open review, and when the type is set.
-
Reviewer Deadlines and Reminders
The response and review periods of reviewer invitations, when reminders go out and how unanswered invitations close.
Troubleshooting
-
I got the invitation e-mail but cannot see it in the panel
Causes and fixes when the e-mail of a review invitation arrived but the invitation does not appear in the panel.
-
I cannot meet the deadline
Asking the editor for more time, or stepping down, when the time given to respond to an invitation or to write the review is not enough.
-
I want to add something to a submitted review
Adding a correction or an explanation later to a review that has been submitted and locked.
-
I can no longer open the files
Why the anonymous files of a work you reviewed no longer open, and where the files are in a new round.
-
I was asked to review again after a revision
The invitation of the new round, its files and your earlier review when you are asked to review the revision of the same work.
More topics on this feature
How-to guides
-
Inviting Reviewers
Inviting a reviewer to a submission under review, from the reviewer pool or by e-mail address.
-
Tracking Invitations and Reviews
Following the status and deadlines of invitations on the Reviewers tab, reading reviews, changing deadlines, cancelling an invitation or inviting a reviewer again.
-
Starting a New Round After a Revision
Making a decision directly after the author submits a revision, or sending the submission to a new review round.
-
Setting Author Guidelines and Review Criteria
Entering the author guidelines, reference style, abstract limit and former titles of a journal, and defining the criteria scored in the review form.
-
Setting the Reviewer Minimum and Reviewer List
Setting the minimum number of reviewers expected in a review round and publishing the yearly list of reviewers of the journal.
Concepts
-
Separation of Duties
An editor who reviewed a submission cannot decide on it, authors take no role on their own submissions, and only the editor-in-chief makes final decisions.
Troubleshooting
-
The reviewer did not receive the invitation e-mail
Helping a reviewer who says the invitation e-mail never arrived to find the invitation in the panel.
-
The reviewer's deadline has passed
Giving more time, cancelling the invitation or inviting another reviewer when a reviewer did not respond in time or is late with the review.